It can range from strict authoritarian military leaders, as exemplified by napoleon and patton, to modern manufacturing department directors. At its worst, autocratic leadership can be stifling, overbearing and demoralizing. The autocratic leadership process generally entails one person making all strategic decisions for subordinates. It is an easy way to cut through administrative red tape to ensure better communication to all workers. Well also study the strengths and weaknesses of this style of leadership. Well study the contexts in which it was born and look at how it is shaping the modern world. Then read the following to learn about autocratic leadership and democratic styles. It is the way in which the leader influences the followers luthans, 1977. This paper investigated the impact of leadership style on the stability of small social dilemma groups.
Here are the key advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership. There are many ways to lead and every leader has own style. Highlights of this leadership style include the owners rules, there is limited staff input, and working methods are defined by the owner. The person who leads or commands a group, organization or country has a vision and leads the group towards a common goal that needs to be achieved cherry 3. Leadership is the ability to move a group towards a common goal that would not be. The leader alone makes decisions and takes responsibility for the conduct, results and achievement of the organization. You might say it is a request that induces compliance or obedience. Autocratic leadership is an extreme form of transactional leadership, where leaders have absolute power over their workers or team. Due to steve jobs high autocratic leadership style, some ways apple might be better off without steve jobs. List of the advantages of the autocratic leadership style 1. The advantages of autocratic leadership are few in comparison to other leadership styles, but this style does have an important role at times. The advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership. Navigating these treacherous waters can be extraordinarily challenging, but it can also give rise to creative decisions that help resolve disagreements in. Therefore, its necessary to take a close look at its pros and cons and consider when it might be an appropriate approach to implement.
Describe the bureaucratic leader, including at least 4 advantages and disadvantages. In this approach, the leader takes most decisions without consulting others and. The democratic leadership style gave the highest level motivation from children and their work continued even when the teacher left the room, in contrast, work from the children ceased altogether under the autocratic leadership style. The impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style. The advantages and disadvantages of the autocratic leadership style show that it can be effective when an organization requires quick, accurate decisions from an experienced leader. The style can work in certain circumstances and it may backfire in many scenarios. The majority of authors stress the advantages of democratic leadership style over autocratic leadership at various levels.
This results in passive resistance from team members and requires continual pressure in order to get things done. It provides for quick decisionmaking because here only one person i. Head teachers leadership style can be categorized into autocratic, democratic, dictatorship and laissez faire. The effect of autocratic leadership style on employee productivity a case study of power holding company of nigeria phcn abstract autocratic leadership style is a system of leadership in which the leaders use in controlling the subordinates, has unrestricted power, it is a centralized system of administration whose nature is always forceful on the employers. The autocratic leadership style has many variations. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. The autocratic leadership style can be illustrated in the structure of a pyramid, whereby on the top of the hierarchy stands the leader, while employees are below. Instead of endlessly deliberating, autocratic leaders quickly assess what needs to be done and make the decisions they feel are best. The big difference between autocratic and demographic leadership style is the fact that in democratic style employees take part give their opinion in decision making. Autocratic leadership is the same as authoritarian leadership. It is an extreme form of leadership where the leader exerts extreme power upon the staff, offering them very few opportunities of saying what they think or of involving themseves actively in the way the activity is. Let us explore the autocratic leadership style pros and cons to know if it is an effective. While those who rely on this approach to heavily are often seen as. The autocratic leadership style is determined by the leaders power due to the fact that the leader has absolute power in a group or organization.
There are several autocratic leadership style pros and cons. In fact, in some situations, an autocratic leadership style might be effective. Autocratic leadership can be defined as a leadership style, wherein a clear line of demarcation between leader and follower exist, as the leader has got absolute power of commanding and decision making. Autocratic leadership autocratic leadership is an extreme form of transactional leadership, where leaders have a lot of power 1 over their people. They cannot criticize or question the leaders way of getting things done. Well examine the core characteristic of the leadership style and provide you with the traits of an autocratic leader. The article presents you all the differences between autocratic and democratic leadership. We argue that the higher the transaction costs of internal organization, the. Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. The children expressed a strong preference for democratic styles and hostility towards autocratic styles. Autocratic leadership examples can be found in all positions of power, such as community leaders, workplace managers, religious leaders and even in the home.
Mangers are poor motivators and employees hardly show creativity and judgment. Democratic leaders are in many ways the opposite of authoritarian leaders because they decentralize authority, frequently consulting with their subordinates and involving them in the formation of plans and policies. This is an extremely effective leadership style when organizations need to achieve goals within a short time frame. Background of the study educational institutions are critical places where the next. As far as specific examples thats tougher to pin point everyone has experience with this leadership style. Autocratic leaders make choices or decisions based on their own beliefs and do not involve others for their suggestion or advice. Difference between autocratic and democratic leadership.
The styles of leadership the terminology style is roughly equivalent to the leaders behavior. It is recommended that autocratic leadership style may be very. Most people are familiar with autocratic leadership and accept it. Autocratic leadership is an extreme form of transactional leadership, where a leader exerts high levels of power over his or her employees or team members. Only an autocratic leader like jobs could ever withstand the public outcry for such basic functionality. Each leadership style has its own benefits and drawbacks, just like autocratic leadership. The laissezfair leadership has the minimal or no authority on its group members, giving full. Some of the more common styles include autocratic, bureaucratic, leadership and laissezfaire. In this guide, well examine autocratic leadership and what it has meant in the past. Chief librarians that autocratic leadership style, no matter the colour it is painted remains a leadership style that. Although it has fallen out of favor in recent decades, the autocratic leadership style is still prevalent. Study on autocratic leadership style management essay. A leadership style in which leaders dictate without consultation of subordinates.
Staff and team members have little opportunity to make suggestions, even if these would be in the teams or the organizations best interest. Influence of principals autocratic leadership style on. In this style of leadership, a leader has complete command and hold over their employeesteam. Autocratic leadership is a form of management style in which one leader or member of the organisation takes decisions on behalf of the company. While the advantages and disadvantages of leadership styles are not always readily apparent, one thing is certain being decisive while avoiding autocratic leadership tactics is necessary for successful leaders and negotiators alike.
The autocratic style provides fast crisis management benefits. The autocratic leadership style was first described by lewin, lippitt, and white in 1938, along with the democratic leadership and the laissezfaire leadership styles. Alternatively a democratic leadership style is defined by a leader. Here are the key advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership to consider. But case in point, the rapid decisions and invention of such items as ipods, i phones were very difficult and complex in implementation. Therefore, autocratic leaders tend to limit the performance of subordinates. An authoritarian leadership style is exemplified when a leader dictates policies and procedures, decides what goals are to be achieved, and directs and controls all activities without any meaningful participation by the subordinates.
The paper aims at detecting relations between participative management and rewarding strategies as well as employees job satisfaction in. The impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style on job satisfaction article pdf available in international business research 52 january 2012 with 55,281 reads how we measure reads. Autocratic leadership style causes production breakdown at chocolate factory. Autocratic leadership is a management style wherein one person controls all the decisions and takes very little inputs from other group members. Under this type of leadership style there is no delay as decision rests with single authority and in times of crunch situation where a.
Researchers of this study categorized leadership styles into three main styles of leadership, which helped to organize the observations into more simplified data. Upon completion of this course, the healthcare provider should be able to. Some transaction cost effects of authoritarian management. There are number of recognized versions, or styles, of leadership, some of which have been shown to be more effective than others.
Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group. Autocratic management with mike bassett, england manager. Autocratic style leadership meaning, advantage, disadvantage. Such a leader has full control of the team, leaving low autonomy within the group the leader has a vision in mind and must be able to effectively motivate their.
Cooperative and autocratic leadership styles in negotiations. Like other leadership styles, the autocratic style has both some benefits and some weaknesses. Another leadership style which can have a negative impact upon the performance of an organization is the autocratic style. Unsurprisingly, as a more extreme style of leadership, it isnt suited to every situation. Hence it may be assumed that head teachers who employ autocratic leadership style get high performance in their schools since there was close supervision of teachers and students. By virtue of their position and job responsibilities, they not only control the efforts of the team, but monitor them for completion often under close scrutiny this style is reminiscent of the earliest tribes and empires. Leadership style is the manner and approach of providing direction, motivating people and achieving objectives. Most appropriate leadership style in most situations the leaders responsibility for the group is to keep the team on task and control the efforts of each team member and what gets completed as a grow the leader of the group takes charge and has complete authority over the process of. On the other hand, a leadership style in which the leader values the opinions and suggestions of the. Some instances call for urgent action and the autocratic style may be best. In the autocratic leadership style, the leader centralizes the decisionmaking power in himself and give directions to his subordinates as to what they are supposed to do and how they are required to perform the given task.
In 1939, a group of researchers led by germanamerican psychologist kurt lewin identified three major leadership. Autocratic leadership is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Staff and team members have little opportunity to make suggestions, even if these would. To be effective, the leader must be able to have proven competencies in their field, as they are responsible for making most of the decisions in the. An authoritarian leader makes decisions on policies, procedures and group objectives with little or no input from his or her team members or followers. Are you trying to decide what leadership style to use at work. Autocratic leadership is a form of management style in which one leader or member of the.
For example, when quick decisions are required, critical project deadlines must be driven, or stressful circumstances where firm leadership conveys a sense that someone is in charge, an autocratic leadership style might be. In an autocratic leadership style, the person in charge has total authority and control over decision making. The leader defines problem, diagnoses problem, generates. Autocratic leadership is very similar to the authoritarian leadership style. Authoritarian leadership, also known as autocratic leadership, is a management style in which an individual has total decisionmaking power and absolute control over his subordinates. As there is no consultation with subordinates, confidential matters can be kept secretly. Leadership is the process of motivating a group of people to act towards accomplishing a common task. An autocratic leadership style is similar to an authoritarian leadership style. The first and foremost advantage of this type of leadership style is that it helps the company in making a quick decision as the decision is centralized with the leader. Although this form of leadership is often found within the government, it is also present in some corporate structures as well.
Person assert ones will over another in an arrogant way. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Characteristics of autocratic leadership in an autocratic leadership style, the person in charge has total authority and control over decision making. Mostly subordinates like to work under centralized authority and strict supervision 3. Frustration, low morale, and conflict develop easily in autocratic leadership because subordinates feel that they work as they have to do so and because of any motivation.
In contrast of autocratic style, democratic takes more time for decision making because of the participation of all staff. Describe the autocratic leader, including at least 4 advantages and disadvantages. In two experiments, group members were more likely to exit their group and take their resources elsewhere if they were supervised by an autocratic style leader than by a democratic or laissezfaire style leader. Advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership. The autocratic leadership style is the one that has the maximum control on the group members, exerting peak levels of authority. Autocratic leadership style unl digital commons university of. This compliance is almost automatic, we really dont think much about it, we just do it for example, if you are driving and a police officer pulls you over and asks see.
In this type of leadership, the rules and procedures that teams use are quite rigid. Autocratic leaders rely on specific rules, policies, and procedures to govern all processes within the workplace. Autocratic leadership also known as authoritarian leadership relies primarily on the use of authority in groups and in organizations goethals, 2004. Someone whos taking no account of other peoples wishes or opinions. The team cannot put forward their views even if they are best for the teams or organizational interests. A critique of the characteristics of an autocratic. The subordinates have nothing to share with their leader and their opinions are not cared for.
683 1062 1489 477 1047 1227 674 231 905 1112 539 620 100 703 57 42 178 357 769 462 1518 474 1513 1296 847 909 1275 798 1329 1016 969 1052 657 502 1472 131 20 1463